Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:26
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
SI cover model Livvy Dunne says she's being stalked in airports by 'middle-aged men' - NBC News
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What can I say to a scammer who thinks he loves me, but I don't want to be scammed?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Poland election: Conservative historian Nawrocki wins presidential vote - BBC
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How did you get to be a leftist?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
People Who Have Been Stuck In A Coma Are Sharing What Happened, And Whoa - BuzzFeed